PRECISELY WHAT NOT TO DO

I am a Trekkie.

I’m not the slightest bit embarrassed about that. Star Trek in all its many incarnations is awesome. I love it, and I have loved it as long as I can remember.

Though I have never been professionally involved in the Star Trek franchise, I did spend a lot of years working on a similar shared-world property: the Forgotten Realms. Working as part of that team for a long time I tried to keep an eye on what other transmedia properties were up to, what helped them succeed, what drove them to failure or near failure, what ignited their fan bases in a good way, and what sent them off into flaming rage.

All the alternate Spock we'll ever need.

All the alternate Spock we’ll ever need.

I quickly learned that you can’t please all of the people all of the time, and no matter what you do, the internet will provide a forum for everything from well-considered and entirely reasonable dissent to babbling, hate-filled nonsense. The only real way to filter through that to get a sense of what works and what doesn’t is by looking at what sells and what doesn’t. A very small core group of Star Trek or Forgotten Realms fans will continue to buy everything (or almost everything) even if they feel the people in control of the franchise have failed them, but the largest part of the audience will take a “fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me” stance and will drop off when you give them stuff they don’t like.

With the announcement of the new edition of D&D burning up the internet I won’t get too deeply into a discussion of my experience with 4th edition D&D and 4th edition FR, just to say that a whole lot of people were making a whole lot of decisions that a whole lot of other people wanted to make differently and everybody involved with 4th edition (including me) was blissfully happy with some parts and miserable over others. It’s the nature of a beast when that beast is made by committee.

But last night I finally sat down, thanks to Netflix, and watched Star Trek: Into Darkness. This is the first Star Trek movie I did not pay to see in the theater. I didn’t even rent the DVD. I waited until I had already paid for it (via my Netflix subscription) and, well, I finally just couldn’t resist.

And I didn’t just not like it, it fully pissed me off.

And here’s where we get to the title of this post:

PRECISELY WHAT NOT TO DO . . .

Gee, nothing says “Star Trek” like a gratuitous underwear shot.

Gee, nothing says “Star Trek” like a gratuitous underwear shot.

Let’s say you’re smart, resourceful, creative, and lucky enough to either create or inherit a massive international transmedia franchise fueled by a giant army of rabid fans. What you need to do is approach that like a doctor would: first, do no harm.

Now, I know there are at least a few people reading this who would say that the 4th edition Forgotten Realms did considerable harm to that setting, and being a part of the team that developed that, I share the blame if that was so.

A lot of what went into the 4th edition FR world was forced on us by radical revisions to the D&D game, especially in the way magic worked. Some of the changes were things I honestly believed, and continue to believe, would reinvigorate the setting, making it more open to players, authors, and game designers alike. And if 4th edition was a failure across the board everybody affiliated with D&D at Wizards of the Coast gets a spoonful of “blame”—but which one of us was assigned to know ahead of time that the entire global economy would crash the moment the game was released? That wasn’t me. And let’s face it, video games long ago siphoned off the lion’s share of the D&D (and other RPGs) audience so the huge customer base from even the 3rd edition days wasn’t there to either like it or not.

But one thing I can say with complete confidence that we did right in the development of the 4th edition Forgotten Realms was that we started with the simple concept that everything that came before is still good.

Every FR novel is still canon. Every FR game product is still canon. That, more than anything else, was why the timeline for the “base” setting moved up so far in the future, so we could figure out how to apply the 4th edition D&D rules as the “new normal” in the FR setting while not tossing out anything you’ve previously read or played.

Drizzt wasn’t recast with a hot young actor and sent through a reverse-order version of The Crystal Shard. Drizzt progressed into the new setting, a setting in which the events of The Crystal Shard were a part of the history of the setting. Remember the Deep Space Nine episode “Trials and Tribble-ations”? Just exactly like that. Deep Space Nine was set in the “future” relative to the original series, but was firmly based on the idea that the original series episode “The Trouble with Tribbles” actually did happen. Right?

But the extraordinary violence that’s been done to Star Trek with these new movies has done just the opposite. Using this time travel thing from the previous movie we’ve been told by the people who, whether they’ll admit to it or not, are temporary caretakers of Star Trek, the same way that I was one of a team of temporary caretakers of the Forgotten Realms, which is now in the hands of a new team, who, for what it’s worth, are doing some really clever things to move the setting forward as they undo some of what the previous edition of the D&D game forced on the setting.

But the new Star Trek said to fans, like me, who have lived with this universe for our entire lives (I was two years old when Star Trek first premiered): “Hey, listen, all that time you spent watching Star Trek: The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager, Enterprise, all of the previous Star Trek feature films, and all the books, comic books, and various and sundry collectibles and whatnot? Yeah, all that’s no good anymore. But look, Uhura is really young and skinny and has the hots for Spock!”

“You wasted more than 500 hours of your life watching all of those other Star Trek series and movies that all of sudden just never happened, but look: Scotty has a goofy sidekick now!”

You have got to be f-ing kidding me.

I sat through Star Trek: Into Darkness, appreciating the visuals—I dug the aliens in the very beginning—but the backwards-ass retelling of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, one of my all time favorite movies, and one I can literally recite line by line, was painful and depressing to watch. I didn’t deserve that. I’ve done nothing but love you, Star Trek, and help pay for you. And this is the thanks I get? Everyone, including people who’ve never seen any Star Trek until this deserve lots more than a few lines stolen from the real movie and otherwise a two-hour J.J. Abrams’s Star Wars audition piece (job well done on that score, J.J., but Star Wars fans be warned).

This is precisely what you do not do when you’ve got a popular transmedia franchise. You do not stop and restart. Ever. You keep moving forward, and take none of your backlist off the table, ever.

And to think, we almost did that to Dragonlance . . .

 

—Philip Athans

 

 

 

About Philip Athans

Philip Athans is the New York Times best-selling author of Annihilation and a dozen other books including The Guide to Writing Fantasy and Science Fiction, and the recently-released How to Start Your Own Religion and Devils of the Endless Deep. His blog, Fantasy Author’s Handbook, (https://fantasyhandbook.wordpress.com/) is updated every Tuesday, and you can follow him on Twitter @PhilAthans.
This entry was posted in Books, comic books, conventions, creative team, Dungeons & Dragons, how to write fiction, intellectual property development, Publishing Business, RPG, Science Fiction & Fantasy Novels, science fiction movies, SF and Fantasy Authors, transmedia, Writing, writing advice, Writing Science Fiction & Fantasy and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to PRECISELY WHAT NOT TO DO

  1. Tharcion says:

    I’m going to have to disagree with your assessment. Aside from enjoying the fresh view of the new Trek versions, the continuity of the old stuff is, at best, suspect. At worst it’s horrible. Enterprise did really nasty things to just about anything; that’s maybe why there are so many suggestions that it was, in fact, “all a dream.”

    Also, yes, gratuitous underwear shots fit perfectly into Star Trek. If anything, the new ones are too tame!

    • bardotbarbiturate says:

      I thought Enterprise was good TV but good Trek? I still haven’t made my mind up.

      • Philip Athans says:

        I liked Enterprise but was, let’s say… nervous… about the whole temporal cold war thing. I have a feeling the series was cancelled before they were able to tell the story they were really shooting for.

      • bardotbarbiturate says:

        The temporal cold war was a very ambitious and fascinating premise, it’s a shame it never reached its’ full potential. The cast never gelled as a crew for me, don’t know what it was.

  2. Zendragon2 says:

    Thank you for not destroying Dragonlance! That setting has it’s own issues to work through and resolve before new material can be introduced.
    Your right, you can’t please all the people all the time. With properties as old as FR and Star Trek you now have different generations involved and how many time do people from 2 or 3 generations agree.
    Just think, the guy who is now in charge of Star Wars was in charge of Star Trek. Can’t wait to see the rage that comes out of that movie. No matter how good or bad, it will have the generations at odds.

  3. bardotbarbiturate says:

    I share your dissatisfaction with Into Darkness. It had me sighing from the very beginning, the volcano was absolute bunkham and as for the Enterprise coming out of the sea? Urgh, they’re concealing themselves from the natives and they think the best way to do this is underwater as opposed to staying in orbit? The scene was just an exercise designed to look impressive and yes, the visuals were VERY impressive but it was blighted so much (at least for me) by the fact that it made no sense.

    I thought the storyline was sound but the execution was poor. What drives me crazy is that Khan was played by Benedict Cumberbatch rather than someone who had the same skin tone and accent as Ricardo Montalban. They can’t use the alternate time line excuse as Khan went into the pod into the mid nineties and the time line didn’t split until long after that. Whatever colour he went in as he had to come out as so which was it? It can’t be both. Maybe it’s some scientific thing, Schrödinger’s Khan where he is both a Mexican and a white British guy, until you open the pod you don’t know. That doesn’t take anything away from Cumberbatch, he was amazing.

    I read somewhere that when they did a test screening of the first reboot film the audience said they wanted more action and less Trek. I don’t know whether that’s true or not but it’s definitely the way things went.

    • Philip Athans says:

      Indeed–likewise Carol Marcus is suddenly Australian, but her father has an American accent. Why? Was she the only actress J.J. Abrams thought looked good in her underwear?

      • bardotbarbiturate says:

        Ah no, not Australian but English but it does still raise the same question. All you could do was assume that perhaps she was born, raised and educated in the UK but you shouldn’t have to create your own back story to explain the things that don’t make sense. This was a huge problem throughout the film and when I picked out the bits that niggled me someone would say “Well perhaps it was because of this or perhaps it was that”. Robert Orci et al were supposed to be telling a cohesive story but instead left us trying to find a logical explanation to make the nonsensical, sensical. And Alice Eve? If J.J. was so intent on having her play Carol Marcus why didn’t he just have her use an American accent?

  4. I stand corrected re: the accent, though i rarely get that wrong! And even though Ricardo Montalban was playing an Indian (Khan Noonian Singh) with his Mexican accent… do we want to make that mistake worse? I don’t know… probably nitpicking now. But ultimately, Star Trek from 1966 on is far from perfect in terms of its own continuity and creative decisions, but when that was used by clever writers as a feature, like the original series klingons vs. the movies/Next Gen klingons in “Trials and Tribble-ations” fun was had by all.

  5. I can’t say I know much about Star Trek, but I do recall a good friend of mine being frustrated by the “actionizing” of his favorite series in the recent films. Regarding Forgotten Realms, your efforts to keep the continuity consistent are very much appreciated.

  6. Jeff Garvin says:

    Thanks for the insight. As a 3.5 hanger-oner, and an enjoyer of the new ST films, I suppose I fall on the other side of the line you have drawn. But I respect and appreciate your earnest appraisal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s